What is the RNA World Hypothesis?
Click to see answer
The RNA World Hypothesis proposes that early life used RNA as both the genetic material and as catalysts (ribozymes), so RNA carried information and performed biochemical reactions.
Click to see question
What is the RNA World Hypothesis?
The RNA World Hypothesis proposes that early life used RNA as both the genetic material and as catalysts (ribozymes), so RNA carried information and performed biochemical reactions.
Name the two landmark discoveries that established catalytic RNA.
Tom Cech discovered self‑splicing Group I introns in Tetrahymena and Sidney Altman discovered RNase P activity in E. coli — key demonstrations that RNA can be catalytic.
How do we distinguish catalytic RNA from autocatalytic RNA?
Catalytic RNA enhances reaction rates and shows turnover (acts on many substrates), while autocatalytic RNA acts on itself to promote a reaction on the same molecule.
Give examples of small, medium and large RNA catalysts.
Small: hammerhead, hepatitis delta, hairpin. Medium: Group I, Group II, RNase P. Large: ribosome, spliceosome.
What is a catalyst (in biochemical terms)?
A catalyst lowers the activation energy by stabilizing the transition state, providing an alternative lower‑energy reaction pathway and thereby greatly accelerating reaction rates.
What does 'turnover' mean for a catalyst?
Turnover is how many catalytic cycles the catalyst performs per unit time (e.g., per minute); catalysts are not consumed by the reaction.
How can catalysts change the reaction pathway?
By binding and stabilizing different intermediates or transition states, catalysts may enable an alternative pathway with a lower energy barrier than the uncatalyzed route.
How did Linus Pauling’s idea relate to enzyme catalysis?
Pauling proposed that enzymes bind substrates in a conformation resembling the transition state, stabilizing it and lowering activation energy — a general principle of catalysis.
What are the two chemical steps in Group I intron self‑splicing?
Two sequential transesterifications: (1) an external guanosine nucleophile attacks the 5' splice site; (2) the newly freed 5' exon attacks the 3' splice site to ligate exons and excise the intron.
How did Tom Cech prove that the RNA itself catalyzes intron excision?
He cloned the corresponding DNA into E. coli and showed intron excision and ligation depended only on the RNA sequence/folding, not on host proteins, demonstrating RNA‑intrinsic activity.
Why was the Tetrahymena precursor RNA hard to purify?
Because the precursor RNA autocatalyzes its own splicing during purification; the molecule itself is active and converts to product, making isolation of the unreacted precursor difficult.
Why is Tetrahymena intron removal precise rather than random hydrolysis?
The intron folds into a specific tertiary structure that positions reactants precisely, ensuring accurate transesterifications that yield the functional RNA product.
What was learned from phosphorothioate (S substitution) experiments at splice sites?
Phosphorothioate substitution makes the phosphate center chiral (Rp/Sp). Experiments showed Rp at the 5' splice site gives Sp in product (inversion), consistent with an SN2‑like displacement mechanism.
What does the observed inversion of configuration imply about the splicing mechanism?
Inversion is consistent with a single‑step nucleophilic displacement (in‑line attack/SN2‑type) and supports the idea of a specific active site that enforces geometry.
Why substitute sulfur for oxygen in the phosphate?
Substituting sulfur creates a chiral phosphorothioate center (Rp/Sp) because sulfur differs from oxygen; this allows stereochemical probing of reaction mechanisms.
What does it mean when Sp at the 5' splice site abolishes reaction?
It indicates the active site is stereospecific—only the correct stereochemical configuration fits and can be processed, showing selectivity like protein enzymes.
What happens when the conserved intronic G–C is mutated to A–U?
The first step of splicing fails, but the reaction can be rescued by adding the nucleoside 2‑aminopurine (2AP), indicating specific interactions at that site.
How does 2‑aminopurine (2AP) rescue the mutant intron?
2AP can form compatible interactions across the mutated base pair that mimic guanosine binding, enabling the first cleavage step in the mutant intron.
How do arginine and citrulline act in G‑binding site experiments?
Arginine can competitively inhibit the wild‑type reaction by mimicking guanosine interactions; citrulline inhibits the mutant +2AP system—both act as competitive inhibitors showing specificity at the binding pocket.
What do the rescue and inhibition experiments reveal about the intron?
They demonstrate the intron contains a specific G‑binding pocket that recognizes the guanosine nucleophile, behaving similarly to a protein enzyme’s substrate‑binding site.
How can a Group I intron be engineered to act in trans?
By designing the intron so the 5' exon (substrate) is a separate oligonucleotide; the intron then folds to cleave that substrate repeatedly — converting an autocatalyst (cis) into a catalyst (trans).
Why engineer ribozymes from autocatalytic introns?
To study catalytic properties like protein enzymes, to create site‑specific RNA cleavage tools, and to explore therapeutic targeting of RNAs.
What limits engineered ribozymes’ turnover in practice?
Product inhibition and strong substrate/product binding (they look similar) reduce turnover; stability and specificity in cellular contexts are additional challenges.
What applications were attempted with engineered ribozymes?
In vitro site‑specific RNA cleavage and therapeutic targeting of viral RNAs; promising in concept but challenging in vivo.
How does phylogenetic covariation help predict RNA secondary structure?
Compensatory mutations (covariation) where one side of a base pair changes and the complementary side changes accordingly indicate conserved base pairing and help infer secondary structure.
What can conserved versus variable sequence regions tell you?
Conserved regions are likely functionally or structurally important; variable regions are less constrained and may be peripheral or permissive to mutation.
What is the significance of the P4–P6 domain in Group I introns?
P4–P6 is a folded domain whose X‑ray structure confirmed phylogenetic predictions; it shows how distal helices pack and that Mg2+ ions help stabilize the tertiary fold.
How are phylogenetic structure predictions experimentally validated?
By biochemical probing (e.g., footprinting, mutagenesis) and structural determination (X‑ray crystallography) which confirm predicted pairings and tertiary contacts.
Who solved the P4–P6 X‑ray structure and what did it show?
Jennifer Doudna solved the P4–P6 X‑ray structure, showing duplex regions fold back on themselves and revealing ordered Mg2+ ions at the interface that stabilize the fold.
Why is Mg2+ commonly required for RNA folding?
Mg2+ neutralizes negative phosphate backbone charges and coordinates to specific sites, enabling compact tertiary folding and stabilizing active conformations.
What is the hammerhead ribozyme?
A small, self‑cleaving RNA motif (named for its T‑shaped fold) that catalyzes site‑specific backbone cleavage when its strands assemble into the active architecture.
What geometric requirement is essential for hammerhead cleavage?
An in‑line attack: the 2'‑OH nucleophile must be collinear with the scissile phosphate and the leaving group — proper backbone/phosphate geometry is required.
Why did the initial hammerhead crystal structure not show the active conformation?
The initial structure included a deoxy substitution at the cleavage site (removing the 2'‑OH nucleophile) and captured an inactive backbone conformation; larger constructs later revealed the active arrangement.
How is hammerhead activity achieved despite metal independence?
Tertiary interactions toggle the ribozyme into an active conformation that aligns reactive groups; high salt and counterions can stabilize the fold, and metals may assist structurally though not always catalytically essential.
What is essential for Hepatitis delta ribozyme cleavage?
A highly conserved cytosine residue proximal to the cleavage site is essential, implicating a role for base‑mediated acid/base chemistry.
How does RNase A catalyze RNA backbone cleavage (as a protein example)?
RNase A uses two conserved histidines; one acts as a general base to deprotonate the 2'‑OH nucleophile, the other as a general acid to protonate the leaving group — histidine pKa (~6.5) suits acid/base chemistry near neutral pH.
Can RNA nucleobases perform acid‑base catalysis?
Yes — certain nucleobases (e.g., cytosine, adenosine) can be protonated/deprotonated in active sites and participate in acid/base catalysis similar to amino acid side chains.
What did structural studies reveal about hepatitis delta ribozyme fold and catalysis?
X‑ray structures showed a fold distinct from other ribozymes but performing the same chemistry, illustrating the diversity of RNA architectures that can achieve similar catalytic outcomes.