L8 _MALDI-TOF MS Bacterial ID_2025 (1)

Created by Vina yau

p.31

What is the Bacterial Test Standard (BTS) used for in MALDI-TOF MS?

Click to see answer

p.31

The BTS is analyzed in parallel with samples in every run and consists of an E. coli extract spiked with two high-molecular-weight proteins, covering the entire mass range of proteins measured during identifications.

Click to see question

1 / 102
p.31
Quality Control in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the Bacterial Test Standard (BTS) used for in MALDI-TOF MS?

The BTS is analyzed in parallel with samples in every run and consists of an E. coli extract spiked with two high-molecular-weight proteins, covering the entire mass range of proteins measured during identifications.

p.31
Quality Control in MALDI-TOF MS

What are the steps involved in Quality Control testing with standard organisms?

  1. Purchase well-characterized organisms from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC).
  2. Subculture from -80C freezer onto blood agar for purity check.
  3. Subculture once more to another blood agar.
  4. Perform MALDI-TOF MS ID using the direct transfer method.
  5. Conduct testing quarterly.
p.2
Historical Microbiology Laboratory Workflow

What are the five steps in the historical microbiology laboratory workflow?

  1. Specimen registration
  2. Put-up and cultivation
  3. ID (Identification)
  4. Drug ST (Susceptibility Testing)
  5. Report
p.3
Pitfalls in Microbial Identification

What is the average turnaround time for the entire workflow of identification and susceptibility testing in microbiology, and why is this a concern for patient management?

The average turnaround time for the entire workflow (ID + ST) is approximately 24 to 72 hours. This is a concern for patient management, especially in cases of sepsis and meningitis, where timely identification and treatment are critical.

p.3
Pitfalls in Microbial Identification

What challenges are associated with identifying 'difficult' pathogens in microbiology?

Identifying 'difficult' pathogens poses several challenges:

  1. Complicated biochemical tests are often required.
  2. The identification process can be time-consuming.
  3. In some cases, an accurate identification cannot be obtained at all.
p.4
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the fundamental hypothesis of MALDI-TOF MS regarding bacterial species?

The fundamental hypothesis is that the phenotypic differences among bacterial species are due to differences in their protein compositions. Each bacterial species has a unique protein fingerprint (protein spectrum) that allows for discrimination between closely related organisms.

p.5
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the principle of mass spectrometry in studying protein compositions?

Mass spectrometry is an ideal method for studying protein compositions based on the mass difference among protein molecules. It works by ionizing proteins to generate charged molecules or fragments, which are then accelerated in a magnetic or electrostatic field towards a detector. The flight time of the ionized proteins varies with their size, allowing for separation based on the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z ratio).

p.6
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the primary method used to ionize proteins in the bacterial cell during MALDI-TOF MS?

The primary method used is a laser beam that focuses on a small spot to accurately target the bacterial cell and remove electrons from protein molecules, sublimating the protein into the gas phase directly.

p.6
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What problem was encountered with using high-energy lasers for ionizing bacterial proteins?

The problem was that bacterial proteins were degraded quickly by the high energy before being ionized, making the method infeasible.

p.6
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What technique was developed to solve the ionization problem in MALDI-TOF MS?

The technique developed to solve the ionization problem is called Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI).

p.7
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the role of the matrix in the MALDI process?

The matrix serves two main purposes:

  1. Absorption of Laser Energy: It absorbs high energy from the laser, protecting the bacterial proteins from direct ionization.

  2. Indirect Ionization: It ionizes the bacterial proteins indirectly through energy transfer from excited matrix molecules.

p.7
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the process of preparing a sample for MALDI-TOF MS?

The preparation process involves:

  1. Mixing the matrix solution, which is a saturated solution of a low-mass organic compound, in excess with the sample.

  2. Allowing the mixture to dry, resulting in the cocrystallization of the sample and matrix, forming a solid deposit of the sample embedded in the matrix.

p.7
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What type of ionization technique is MALDI-TOF MS classified as?

MALDI-TOF MS is classified as a soft ionization technique.

p.8
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the principle of MALDI-TOF MS regarding ionization?

MALDI-TOF MS operates on the principle of Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization, where a strong absorbance at the laser wavelength leads to the ionization of clinical specimens. The matrix must be soluble in compatible solvents to create an effective matrix-specimen mixture.

p.8
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is a common matrix used for bacterial identification in MALDI-TOF MS?

The common matrix used for bacterial identification in MALDI-TOF MS is α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (HCCA), which is particularly suitable for large protein analysis.

p.9
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the wavelength of the nitrogen laser used in MALDI-TOF MS?

The wavelength of the nitrogen laser used in MALDI-TOF MS is 337nm.

p.9
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

Why is the irradiation time of the UV laser kept short in MALDI-TOF MS?

The irradiation time of the UV laser is kept short to avoid damage or fragmentation of proteins.

p.10
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the principle of Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI)?

MALDI involves matrix molecules that absorb high energy from a laser beam, becoming ionized. This process excites the matrix molecules, which then ionize the protein molecules in the sample, leading to the vaporization of both the matrix and the sample.

p.11
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What happens to proteins after they are ionized in MALDI-TOF MS?

Once ionized, proteins become positively charged and travel toward the negatively charged time-of-flight (TOF) tube.

p.11
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the significance of maintaining a vacuum condition in the time-of-flight tube of MALDI-TOF MS?

Maintaining a vacuum condition in the TOF tube is essential as it allows molecules to be separated according to their velocities without interference from air molecules.

p.11
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

Describe the movement of ions in the TOF tube during MALDI-TOF MS.

After entering the TOF tube, the ions move into a field-free drift region where they continue to travel towards the mass detector.

p.12
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

How does the m/z ratio affect the drift time of protein molecules in MALDI-TOF MS?

Protein molecules with a larger m/z ratio will have a longer drift time compared to those with a smaller m/z ratio.

p.12
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What type of spectrum can be obtained after the MALDI-TOF MS process is completed?

Upon completion, a spectrum of proteins with different m/z ratios can be obtained.

p.13
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

What is the mass range of proteins captured for bacterial identification in MALDI-TOF MS?

The mass range of proteins captured for bacterial identification is 2,000 – 20,000 m/z.

p.13
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

Why are ribosomal proteins significant in MALDI-TOF MS analysis?

Ribosomal proteins are significant because they are ubiquitously expressed throughout all phases of growth, making them more reproducible for analysis.

p.13
Principle of MALDI-TOF MS

How does signal intensity relate to protein quantities in MALDI-TOF MS?

Signal intensity in MALDI-TOF MS is directly proportional to the quantities of the protein of a particular m/z.

p.14
MALDI-TOF MS Workflow

What is the first step in the Direct Transfer method of MALDI-TOF MS workflow?

The first step is to trace a small amount of bacterial mass from a single colony of an overnight culture.

p.14
MALDI-TOF MS Workflow

What is done after smearing the bacterial mass onto the target plate in the MALDI-TOF MS workflow?

After smearing, 1 microliter of matrix solution is overlaid on the bacterial smear.

p.14
MALDI-TOF MS Workflow

How long should the target plate be left to dry in the MALDI-TOF MS workflow?

The target plate should be left to dry in room air for 5 minutes.

p.14
MALDI-TOF MS Workflow

What is the purpose of the matrix solution in the MALDI-TOF MS workflow?

The matrix solution assists in the ionization of the bacterial samples during the mass spectrometry process.

p.14
MALDI-TOF MS Workflow

What does the color coding on the MALDI-TOF plate indicate?

The color coding indicates the status of each spot, such as not occupied, prepared, measured, classified, or spectra present.

p.15
MALDI-TOF MS Workflow

What is the purpose of the on plate extraction method in MALDI-TOF MS?

The on plate extraction method is used for preparing samples from some Gram Positive organisms and Yeast for analysis in MALDI-TOF MS.

p.15
MALDI-TOF MS Workflow

What are the key components involved in the on plate extraction method for MALDI-TOF MS?

The key components include:

  1. 70% Formic acid - used for sample extraction.
  2. Matrix - essential for ionization of the sample during mass spectrometry.
p.15
MALDI-TOF MS Workflow

What steps are involved in the MALDI-TOF MS workflow after sample preparation?

The steps involved after sample preparation include:

  1. Applying the sample to the MALDI target plate.
  2. Inserting the target plate into the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer.
  3. Analyzing the results displayed on the computer screen, which includes a grid of wells and a table of identified organisms.
p.16
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the process for microbial identification using MALDI-TOF MS after spectra are generated?

Once spectra are generated, they are compared to a database of defined reference spectra to lead to microbial identification.

p.16
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a score value indicate in the context of MALDI-TOF MS results?

A score value indicates the reliability of the identification, with higher scores suggesting more reliable identifications. For example, Clostridium perfringens has scores of 2.387 and 2.407, indicating reliable identification, while a score of 1.282 indicates 'no reliable identification.'

p.16
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What are the implications of the comments associated with the detected species in the MALDI-TOF MS results?

Comments provide additional context for the identification, such as the need for extraction to permit reliable species identification or that certain species are closely related and not definitively distinguishable at the moment.

p.16
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

How does the presence of closely related species affect the interpretation of MALDI-TOF MS results?

The presence of closely related species, such as Escherichia coli and Shigella, complicates identification, as they may not be definitively distinguishable based on the spectra alone, necessitating further analysis or extraction for reliable identification.

p.16
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the significance of the Acinetobacter baumannii /calcoaceticus complex in MALDI-TOF MS results?

The Acinetobacter baumannii /calcoaceticus complex indicates that multiple species may be present, and extraction must be performed to allow for reliable species identification, highlighting the complexity of microbial identification in this group.

p.17
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a score value of 3.0 indicate in MALDI-TOF MS result interpretation?

A score value of 3.0 indicates fully identical protein spectra between the sample and the database.

p.17
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What score value range indicates secure genus identification and probable species identification?

The score value range of 2.000 to 2.299 indicates secure genus identification and probable species identification.

p.17
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the interpretation of a score value less than 1.700 in MALDI-TOF MS?

A score value of less than 1.700 indicates no identification can be made.

p.17
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What score value range corresponds to highly probable species identification?

The score value range of 2.300 to 3.000 corresponds to highly probable species identification.

p.17
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a score value between 1.700 and 1.999 indicate?

A score value between 1.700 and 1.999 indicates probable genus identification.

p.18
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the significance of a high score value in MALDI-TOF MS results?

A high score value indicates a strong match between the analyte and the identified organism, suggesting reliable identification. Typically, a score above 2.0 is considered reliable, while scores below this may indicate uncertain identification.

p.18
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

Which organism was identified with the highest score value in the provided results?

The organism identified with the highest score value is Acinetobacter baumannii, with a score of 2.321 for analyte F4.

p.18
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a score value of 1.994 indicate about the identification of analyte A5?

A score value of 1.994 for analyte A5 indicates that the identification is not reliable, as it falls below the threshold for reliable identification (typically 2.0).

p.18
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

How do the score values for Clostridium perfringens compare between the best and second best matches?

For Clostridium perfringens, the score values are very close: the best match has a score of 2.387 and the second best match has a score of 2.357. This indicates a strong consistency in identification for this organism.

p.18
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What can be inferred about the reliability of identification for analytes H1 and H3?

Analyte H1 has a score value of 1.813, indicating not reliable identification, while analyte H3 has a score of 2.084, which is considered a reliable identification. This shows a clear distinction in the reliability of the identifications between these two analytes.

p.19
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a score value of 2.407 indicate in the context of MALDI-TOF MS results?

A score value of 2.407 indicates a high confidence match for the sample, classified as '+++'.

p.19
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What are the three consistency categories in MALDI-TOF MS result interpretation?

The three consistency categories are:

  1. Category A: Species consistency - best match is classified as 'green', with further matches being the same species or at least the same genus.
  2. Category B: Genus consistency - best match is 'green' or 'yellow', with further matches having at least the same genus, but not fulfilling species consistency.
  3. Category C: No consistency - neither species nor genus consistency is present.
p.19
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does Category A in the consistency classification signify?

Category A signifies species consistency, where the best match is classified as 'green', and further matches are of the same species or at least the same genus as the first match.

p.19
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the significance of a match classified as '(-)' in MALDI-TOF MS results?

A match classified as '(-)' indicates a low confidence match, suggesting that the identified organism may not be closely related to the sample, and further investigation is needed.

p.19
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

How are the matched patterns ranked in MALDI-TOF MS results?

Matched patterns are ranked based on their score values, with higher scores indicating better matches. The ranks range from '+++' for the best matches to '(-)' for the least confident matches.

p.20
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a Score Value of 2.967 indicate in the context of MALDI-TOF MS results for Clostridium perfringens?

A Score Value of 2.967 indicates a strong identification of Clostridium perfringens, suggesting high confidence in the match.

p.20
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

How are the organisms ranked in the MALDI-TOF MS results table?

Organisms are ranked based on their Score Value, with higher scores indicating better matches to the analyte.

p.20
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the significance of the matched pattern in the MALDI-TOF MS results?

The matched pattern indicates the specific strain or variant of the organism that corresponds to the analyte, providing detailed identification beyond just the species level.

p.20
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a Score Value of 1.288 signify for the analyte A5 in the MALDI-TOF MS results?

A Score Value of 1.288 signifies that the identification for analyte A5 is not reliable, indicating low confidence in the match.

p.20
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

In the context of MALDI-TOF MS, what does a rank of (++) indicate about the quality of the match?

A rank of (++) indicates a moderate quality match, suggesting that while the identification is likely correct, there may be some uncertainty compared to higher-ranked matches.

p.21
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the score value requirement for the best match in Category A of MALDI-TOF MS result interpretation?

The best match has a score value >2.

p.21
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What must be true for ranks with a score value >2 in MALDI-TOF MS result interpretation?

All ranks with score value >2 (Green colour) must have the same species-level ID with the best match.

p.21
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the requirement for ranks with a score value of 1.7-1.99 in MALDI-TOF MS result interpretation?

All ranks with score value 1.7-1.99 (Yellow colour) must have the same species-level OR Genus-level ID with the best match.

p.22
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a Score Value of 2.576 indicate in the context of MALDI-TOF MS results?

A Score Value of 2.576 indicates a high confidence in the identification of the organism, Arthrobacter sulfureus, as the best match for Sample D.

p.22
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

How are the organisms ranked in the MALDI-TOF MS results?

Organisms are ranked based on their Score Value, with higher scores indicating better matches to the sample analyzed. The rank also includes a quality classification, such as (+++) or (++).

p.22
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does the presence of a second best match with a lower Score Value suggest about the identification of an organism?

The presence of a second best match with a lower Score Value suggests that while the first match is the best identification, there may be other closely related organisms, but with less confidence in their identification.

p.22
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a Score Value of 1.332 indicate for the unidentified organism in the results?

A Score Value of 1.332 indicates that the identification of the organism is not reliable, as it is below the threshold for confident identification in MALDI-TOF MS.

p.22
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the significance of the quality ranking (e.g., +++, ++, -) in the MALDI-TOF MS results?

The quality ranking indicates the confidence level of the identification, with +++ representing high confidence, ++ indicating moderate confidence, and - suggesting low confidence in the identification of the organism.

p.23
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What are the criteria for interpreting results in Category B for MALDI-TOF MS when the best match has a score value of 1.7-1.99?

In Category B, when the best match has a score value of 1.7-1.99 (Yellow colour), the following criteria must be met:

  • All ranks with score value 1.7-1.99 must have the same species-level OR genus-level ID as the best match.
p.23
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What conditions apply in Scenario 2 of Category B for MALDI-TOF MS result interpretation?

In Scenario 2 of Category B, when the best match has a score value greater than 2 (Green colour), the following conditions apply:

  • One or more ranks with score value >2 may have different species-level IDs but must share the same genus-level ID as the best match.
  • All ranks with score value 1.7-1.99 (Yellow colour) must have at least an identical genus-level ID with the best match.
p.24
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a Score Value indicate in MALDI-TOF MS results?

The Score Value indicates the confidence level of the identification of an organism, with higher values representing more reliable identifications.

p.24
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the significance of Category C in MALDI-TOF MS results?

Category C indicates not reliable identification, suggesting that the results should be interpreted with caution and may not accurately represent the organism present.

p.24
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

How are the best match and second best match represented in MALDI-TOF MS results?

The best match is the organism with the highest Score Value, while the second best match is the organism with the second highest Score Value, both providing potential identifications for the analyte.

p.24
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a Score Value of 1.244 indicate in the context of MALDI-TOF MS results?

A Score Value of 1.244 indicates a not reliable identification, suggesting that the identification of the organism is uncertain and should be verified with additional methods.

p.24
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

In the provided data, which organism has the highest Score Value for the best match?

The organism with the highest Score Value for the best match is Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron with a Score Value of 2.051.

p.25
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a Score Value of 2.253 indicate in the context of MALDI-TOF MS results?

A Score Value of 2.253 indicates a strong match for the organism Alcaligenes eutrophus, suggesting high confidence in the identification based on the MALDI-TOF MS analysis.

p.25
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

How are the organisms ranked in the MALDI-TOF MS results?

Organisms are ranked based on their Score Value, with higher scores indicating better matches to the analyzed sample. The ranking also includes quality indicators such as (++) for the best match and (+) for secondary matches.

p.25
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the significance of the second best match in the MALDI-TOF MS results?

The second best match, Ralstonia eutropha with a Score Value of 1.994, provides an alternative identification option, which can be useful for confirming results or considering potential misidentifications.

p.25
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a Type C classification indicate in MALDI-TOF MS results?

A Type C classification indicates that the identification of the organism is less certain, often due to lower Score Values or ambiguous results, necessitating further validation or testing.

p.26
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What does a score value of <1.7 indicate in MALDI-TOF MS result interpretation?

A score value of <1.7 indicates that the best match is not reliable for identification, falling into Category C.

p.26
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

In Scenario 2 of Category C, what does a score value of 1.7-1.99 signify?

A score value of 1.7-1.99 signifies that the best match has a different genus-level ID compared to all ranks with the same score range, which are highlighted in yellow.

p.26
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What are the implications of a score value >2 in Scenario 3 of Category C?

A score value >2 indicates that the best match is reliable, but one or more ranks with this score may have a different genus-level ID compared to the best match, and all ranks with score values 1.7-1.99 also have different genus-level IDs.

p.27
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the reporting protocol for bacterial identification results categorized as A in MALDI-TOF MS?

Bacterial ID results with category A can generally be reported to the clinician, except for some species that share similar protein spectra, which require biochemical tests for confirmation.

p.27
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the acceptable identification level for bacteria isolated from non-sterile sites in category B?

For bacteria isolated from non-sterile sites (e.g., urine, stool), genus level identification is acceptable.

p.27
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What identification level is necessary for bacteria isolated from sterile sites in category B?

For bacteria isolated from sterile sites (e.g., blood, CSF, body fluids), species level (category A) reporting is necessary.

p.27
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What methods can be used for confirmation of bacterial identification in category B from sterile sites?

Confirmation methods include:

  1. Re-measurement using MALDI-TOF MS with on-plate extraction (with FA)
  2. Biochemical tests (manual or Vitek automatic system)
  3. 16s rRNA sequencing
p.27
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is required for bacterial identification in category C?

In category C, re-measurement with MALDI-TOF MS, biochemical test identification, or 16s rRNA sequencing must be performed to achieve species/genus level identification.

p.28
Limitations of MALDI-TOF MS

What are some examples of closely related organisms that MALDI-TOF MS may not differentiate well?

  • Escherichia coli and Shigella species
  • Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus mitis group
  • Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus canis, and Streptococcus dysgalactiae
p.28
Limitations of MALDI-TOF MS

What is a limitation of MALDI-TOF MS regarding Salmonella species?

MALDI-TOF MS cannot provide species-level identification for Salmonella spp.; serotyping is necessary for accurate identification.

p.28
Limitations of MALDI-TOF MS

In what context is MALDI-TOF MS not useful for direct testing?

MALDI-TOF MS is not useful for direct testing of clinical specimens, except for blood samples.

p.28
Limitations of MALDI-TOF MS

How does the database used in MALDI-TOF MS affect its identification capabilities?

Identification is limited by the entries in the database; for example, the library used by HA hospital does not contain highly infectious agents such as Vibrio cholerae, Bacillus anthracis, Burkholderia pseudomallei/mallei, and Yersinia pestis.

p.28
Limitations of MALDI-TOF MS

What types of colonies may not be identified by MALDI-TOF MS?

Tiny or mucoid colonies may not be identified by MALDI-TOF MS, as they require extraction for proper identification.

p.29
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What supplementary tests are needed to confirm the identification of Escherichia coli using MALDI-TOF MS?

Escherichia coli needs to be confirmed by:

  1. Lactose fermentation
  2. Indole production
p.29
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

How can Streptococcus pneumoniae be differentiated from S. mitis and S. oralis?

Streptococcus pneumoniae can be differentiated by:

  1. Optochin test susceptibility
  2. Bile solubility test
p.29
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What tests are required to confirm the identification of Streptococcus pyogenes?

Streptococcus pyogenes requires confirmation through:

  1. Bacitracin test susceptibility
  2. PYR test
p.29
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the next step for identifying Salmonella spp. after MALDI-TOF MS results?

For Salmonella spp., the next step is to proceed to serology for serotyping identification.

p.30
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What supplementary tests are recommended for the identification of Vibrio cholerae when the MALDI-TOF result indicates Vibrio albensis?

  1. Vitek
  2. 01, 0139 Serotyping
  3. Salt tolerance
p.30
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What are the organisms to be considered when the MALDI-TOF result indicates Burkholderia thailandensis?

Burkholderia pseudomallei / Burkholderia mallei

p.30
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What supplementary tests should be performed for the identification of Yersinia pestis when the MALDI-TOF result indicates Yersinia pseudotuberculosis?

  1. Perform in BSC
  2. Vitek
p.30
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What supplementary tests are necessary for identifying Bacillus anthracis when the MALDI-TOF result shows Bacillus cereus?

  1. Perform in BSC
  2. Motility test
  3. Penicillin susceptibility
  4. Haemolysis
  5. Vitek
p.30
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the recommended action for any Ochrobactrum species identified by MALDI-TOF?

  1. Perform in BSC
p.30
Result Interpretation in MALDI-TOF MS

What supplementary tests are suggested for identifying Brucella species when the MALDI-TOF result indicates Psychrobacter phenylpyruvicus, Bordetella bronchiseptica, or Bergeyella zoohelcum?

  1. Check growth characteristics (Slow growing on BA /CHO and no growth on MAC)
  2. Gram Stain
  3. Oxidase
  4. Serology typing
  5. Vitek
p.31
Quality Control in MALDI-TOF MS

What is the purpose of Quality Control in MALDI-TOF MS?

To ensure that the spectra measurement is accurate and that all parameters and settings of the software are correct.

Study Smarter, Not Harder
Study Smarter, Not Harder